Multichannel Publishing, Mixed Priorities, and đ© Comms
The authority on mixternal comms
đ Halloween is on Oct. 31, a Monday. If your newsletter goes out Monday mornings, this is an opportunity to be scarily clever.
The advanced Learning Institute hosts Diversity, Equity & Inclusion For Internal Communications Oct. 19-21 (virtual) .
simplyEXP 2022 for internal comms pros is Nov. 14-15 in London.
Omnichannel. Multichannel. Same Diff.
You must publish across multiple channels consistently. Itâs the only way to create a virtuous loop of content generation, feedback, and metrics. Moreover, itâs the only way to reach employees where they are, not where you want them to be.
Channels should include internal and external channels, the essence of mixternal comms.
Multichannel publishing is alive and well in comms, according to a couple of new studies. (Whether the strategy is intentional or a byproduct of haphazard comms is uncertain.)
Above is a snippet of an infographic from Digital Signage Today with results from a recent study that asked IC professionals about challenges and opportunities over the next few years.
According to Ragan/PoliteMailâs The State of Corporate Communications Survey 2022, the most popular place to publish employee news is SharePoint (i.e., internal) and the most popular service for video publishing is YouTube (i.e., external). Of the tools respondents find most valuable, multichannel analytics dashboard tops the list.
Publishing to a platform, rather than to individual channels, is the surest way to increase the return on investment (ROI) for your time, effort, and output.
Channels are distinct outlets. A newsletter is a channel. So is a Twitter feed. So is a bathroom poster.Â
A platform contains contributors, multiple channels, and feedback loops that interact across three levels of activity, in order:Â
Ideation and CreationÂ
Publishing and Distribution
Engagement and Feedback
Go deeper: Publish to a Platform, Not Just to a Channel (Mister Editorial)
â ïž Just donât be annoying. See below.
Bonus: Ragan/PoliteMail note that communicators seek âmore attention and acknowledgment from leadership.â Good luck with that. đ What About That Seat at the Table? (Mister Editorial)
Quick Hits
đŹ Hereâs a helpful guide of eight best practices for learning how to write for executives. My favorite advice is number six. (The Switchboard)
đ» A new study from Microsoft suggests three areas managers need to work on to improve the hybrid work experience:
End productivity paranoia
Embrace the fact that people come in for each other
Re-recruit your employees
đ° A new tool and scorecard from Aon, Axa, Bank of America, and Prudential helps companies measure and improve the mental health of their workers. Itâs aim is to combat workplace stress and anxiety. (Bloomberg)
Is There a Disconnect?
57% of internal comms pros in simplycommunicateâs workspace report âïž say âculture and engagementâ is a top priority for the next 12 months.
70% of survey respondents in Ragan/PoliteMailâs survey say âImproving employee retention and engagementâ is a strategic goal.
I quibble with the line of questioning. While intertwined, âretentionâ and âengagementâ are separate activities and outcomes.
So here we have two big studies from both sides of the Atlantic where internal comms pros declare that boosting âengagementâ (whatever that means) is a primary goal for the next year.
âEngagementâ appears 22 times in the Ragan/PoliteMail survey and five times in simplycommunicateâs topline report. Across both reports, a definition of âengagementâ appears zero times.
MeanwhileâŠ
40% of employees say health and well-being are their top concerns âïž, according to the Integral Employee Activation Index. Additional priorities include job creation (32%), data privacy (23%), income inequality (21%), gender inequality (20%), and racial inequality (19%).
Since Integral released its study in July economies have taken a turn for the worst. Layoffs and hiring freezes are in the news daily and a recession is looming.
Today I suspect that job preservation would be top of mind for many (most?) employees.
Questions:
If âemployee engagementâ is the main KPI for your team, what exactly do you mean by that?
How does your top priority square with employeesâ priorities?
Employees Are Overwhelmed
Thereâs too much information coming from too many sources for employees to absorb and manage. No news there. Internal comms pros know it through experience, evidence, and simple gut checks.
Employee comms might be part of the problem because a shallow form of âengagementâ is an important metric for âsuccess.â
Prime examples include likes, comments, and internal shares. These are examples of volumetrics.
Poll participation, feedback, idea generation, views, listens, and social media postings are other engagement metrics.
Employee comms is pressuring employees to âengageâ in order to generate metrics that make the output seem worthwhile.
Weâre distracting our coworkers with soft demands to respond to our pings, dings, chirps, chimes, social share buttons, and empty comment fields. Weâre increasing their anxiety for the sake of our engagement metrics.
This isnât entirely all commsâ fault. Itâs a systems issue. Other departments, like IT, HR, Security, and others, must also share some of the blame for fostering a work environment taped together with 30, 40, 50(!) applications.
More questions:
How can we ensure comms is not part of the problem?
Do we get smarter about what we ask employees to do?
Maybe we change our definition of and metrics around âengagement.â
đ€ Or maybe we altogether stop making âengagementâ a goal.
Go deeper: What If âEmployee Engagementâ Is the Problem?
Weâve learned that our policy is great but our comms is shit.
âPenny Mordaunt, the U.K.âs House of Commons leader, explaining why the governmentâs ill-conceived tax policy failed to gain traction
Editorâs note: No amount of great comms will save a shitty idea đ©.
Interesting Opportunities
Aritzia - Manager, Retail Comms (Vancouver)
BAE Systems - Head of Internal Comms (remote available, London)
Brilliant Ink - Contract Comms Research Analyst (remote, U.S.A.)
Heifer International - Public Relations Officer (remote, U.S.A.) - Chelsey Louzeiro is the hiring manager
MAKE Corporation - Executive Comms Consultant (Chicago) - Meredith Cornelison is the recruiter
Mars Wrigley - Internal Comms Director, North America (Newark, NJ) - Word is this is a âvery visible role with a lot of opportunity for growth.â
Virgin Voyages - several internal comms and brand roles (Florida)
đ€š Donât know what to think about the employee in Virginâs job ad posing with S&M bondage accessoriesâŠ
Advertise your open role in Mister Editorial. Email editorshaun@gmail.com.
Story Opportunity
Click the tweet âïž to follow the thread, learn more, and get the link to the index.
âïž Youâre all caught up!
Thank you for being a part of Mister Editorial.
Read past editions of Mister Editorial here.
If youâre enjoying what youâre reading, please consider recommending it to others. They can sign up here. Browse the most popular content here.
Have feedback? Send me a note at editorshaun@gmail.com. Connect with me on LinkedIn and Twitter.
Disclaimer: Besides running Mister Editorial, I am the editor-in-chief of Digital Publications at Lam Research. The views in this newsletter are my own.
Mister Editorial is a reader-supported project. To receive updates and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid member.








You used DALL-E for the header image -- I just got access this week, and I've been thinking about using it or other AIs to generate some images for some newsletters, but I was a little unclear on the OKness of this (Craiyon, at least, made it hard for me to interpret if internal use by a business was OK). Looking at the terms for OpenAI, it looks like they make it a little more clear that you're free to use the images however you like. Good to know; I'll have to keep in mind before I bother our graphic designers next time.
"a virtuous loop"
Yes.